Month: July 2008

  • Recognised at Long Last

    Recognised at Long Last

    In one of its last judgments before the summer break, the Court found violations on several counts in a case lodged by the Austrian Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas (Austrian Jehovah’s Witnesses). The religious community applied for legal recognition as a religious society and asked to

    Continue reading →

  • Turkish AK Party Fined But Not Dissolved

    Turkish AK Party Fined But Not Dissolved

    Yesterday, the Constitutional Court of Turkey ruled that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s AK Party will not be banned. It was a Phyrric victory for the party, however. A majority of the judges voted to close down the party, but the majority was not large

    Continue reading →

  • Losing Flux – Freedom of Expression Case

    Losing Flux – Freedom of Expression Case

    Today the Moldovan newspaper Flux for the first time lost a case before the European Court of Human Rights. The newspaper is famous among Strasbourg watchers. It instituted and won six earlier cases before the Court and each time a violation of Article 10 ECHR

    Continue reading →

  • Request for Interim Measure on Turkish AK Party – Dismissed

    Request for Interim Measure on Turkish AK Party – Dismissed

    Last Friday, 25 July, the Court received an application by Ali Sezer relating to the possible dissolution of the ruling party in Turkey, the AK Party (Justice and Development Party). The applicant also asked for an interim measure “to prevent the Turkish Constitutional Court from

    Continue reading →

  • Kononov judgment available

    Kononov judgment available

    The Kononov judgment I mentioned in last Friday’s post is now available on the Court’s website (in English and in French). To find it, click here.

    Continue reading →

  • World War II Crimes Revisited

    World War II Crimes Revisited

    It is relatively rare, but sometimes echoes of crimes committed during World War II reach the Strasbourg Court. In such instances the Court is called upon to look into atrocities which themselves gave rise to the drafting of the Convention and the creation of the

    Continue reading →

  • Judicial Ethics

    Judicial Ethics

    Article 21 ECHR provides that the Court’s judges shall be of high moral character, qualified, impartial and independent. These criteria have been further specified in the Rules of Court. Apparently, this was not sufficient – or at least not sufficiently known to the general public.

    Continue reading →

  • Separate, But Still Equal

    Separate, But Still Equal

    After the Czech Republic and Greece, it was Croatia’s turn last week to be faced with a complaint of unequal treatment of Roma in schools. In the case of Orsus and others v. Croatia, the European Court of Human Rights addressed the issue of Roma-only

    Continue reading →

  • Hate Speech Case

    Hate Speech Case

    Restricting hate speech is often a contentious point from the perspective of human rights. Last week, the Court issued a judgment on such speech in the French case of Soulas and others. Soulas was the publisher of a book written by Guillaume Faye entitled ‘La

    Continue reading →

  • New Articles on ECHR

    New Articles on ECHR

    There are two recent articles I would like to draw your attention to. The first is: Edouard Dubout, ‘Interprétation téléologique et politique jurisprudentielle de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme’, which has appeared in the latest issue of the Revue Trimetrielle des Droits de

    Continue reading →

Subscribe


Further Reading

Earlier posts

2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008