A new batch of academic writing related to the Convention and the Court:
* A. Berkaw, ‘Presumed guilty: how the European Court handles criminal libel cases in violation of Article 6(2) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 50, no. 3 (2011/12) pp. 774-804.
* A. Sarvarian, ‘Common ethical standards for counsel before the European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 23, no. 4 (2012) pp. 991-1014.
Then, two issues of the German Law Journal. The issue vol. 13, no. 6 (2012) included:
* B. Peters, ‘Germany’s dialogue with Strasbourg: extrapolating the Bundesverfassungsgericht’s relationship with the European Court of Human Rights in the preventive detention decision’, pp. 757-772.
* S. Kirchner, ‘The personal scope of the right to life under Article 2(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights after the judgment in A, B and C v. Ireland’, pp. 783-792.
And the subsequent issue, no. 7, featured:
* P. De Hert and F. Korenica, ‘The doctrine of equivalent protection: its life and legitimacy before and after the European Union’s accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’, pp. 874-895.
Finally, the Michigan Journal of International Law (Vol. 33, no. 4, Summer 2012) included:
* Barbara Miltner, ‘Revisiting Extraterritoriality After Al-Skeini: The ECHR and Its Lessons.’
