• Discrimination in Latvia

    Discrimination in Latvia

    •

    As Latvia is struggling with a governmental and economic crisis, last week bad news also came from Strasbourg for the Baltic country: in the case of Andrejeva v. Latvia, the Grand Chamber found violations of Article 14 in conjunction with Article 1…

    Continue reading →

  • Complaining Online

    Complaining Online

    •

    Taking your claim to Strasbourg has now become even easier, that is, if the complaint is directed against either the Netherlands or Sweden. On a trial basis the Court has launched a service through which complaints against these countries can be filled…

    Continue reading →

  • The Court in Fifteen Minutes

    The Court in Fifteen Minutes

    •

    The Court has just posted an updated version of its short documentary ‘The Conscience of Europe’. The film is meant for the general public, but I would also recommend it as a teaching tool in classes on introductions to human rights. It…

    Continue reading →

  • Two Grand Chamber Judgments Today

    Two Grand Chamber Judgments Today

    •

    Today the Grand Chamber of the Court issued two judgments. The first was the Turkish case of Kozacioğlu in which the Grand Chamber unanimously found a violation of Article 1 of Protocol 1 ECHR (peaceful enjoyment of property). That cleared the skies…

    Continue reading →

  • Elected Once More

    Elected Once More

    •

    This week the Danish judge Peer Lorenzen was re-elected by his peers (what’s in a name!) as president of one of the Court’s fifth section. Judge Lorenzen has been around for a long time inm Strasbourg; previously, he served in the European…

    Continue reading →

  • The Non-Legal Approach to the ECHR

    The Non-Legal Approach to the ECHR

    •

    Allow me to point your attention to the International Courts Data site, made by Erik Voeten of Georgetown University. A portal of information on international and regional courts from a political sciences perspective. The site has a special page devoted to the…

    Continue reading →

  • Article on Procedural ECHR Aspects and Legitimacy

    Article on Procedural ECHR Aspects and Legitimacy

    •

    Two of my former colleagues, Tom Barkhuysen and Michiel van Emmerik of Leiden University, have just made available online their contribution to the book: Huls, Adams & Bomhoff (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Court Rulings (TMC Asser Press, the Hague 2009). Their…

    Continue reading →

  • Judges Who Are Too Talkative

    Judges Who Are Too Talkative

    •

    It happens around the world that politicians comment on ongoing court cases. Rightly so, this is very often condemned as being detrimental to good and fair judicial proceedings, especially in the public perception. A fortiori, one would say, judges themselves should not…

    Continue reading →

  • Women on Waves

    Women on Waves

    •

    Yesterday, the Court issued its judgment in the case of Women on Waves and others v. Portugal and found a violation of Article 10 ECHR (freedom fo expression). The applicants were three NGOs: a Dutch one (owning a boat on which they…

    Continue reading →

  • Costa’s Views on the Court

    Costa’s Views on the Court

    •

    As announced, the Court formally opened its judicial year last Friday – a very special occasion, since the Court exists fifty years. Thus, it provided the oppportunity for the Court’s president, Jean-Paul Costa, to look back in his speech at what the…

    Continue reading →