• Red Star Judgment

    Red Star Judgment

    The symbol of the red star was at the core of a dispute on which the European Court of Human Rights decided yesterday. In its judgment in the case of Vajnai v. Hungary it found a violation of the freedom of expression…

    Continue reading →

  • Keeping Track of Disappearances

    Keeping Track of Disappearances

    Last week, the European Court handed down judgments in three new disappearance cases, finding amongst others violations of the right to life: Ruslan Umarov v. Russia, Musayeva v. Russia, and Akhiyadova v. Russia. I have earlier commented that the stream of this…

    Continue reading →

  • What’s in a Name (Again)?

    What’s in a Name (Again)?

    “Names are central elements of self-identification and self-definition.” That is what the Court held in last week’s judgment in the case of Daróczy v. Hungary. The case concerned a widow who was forced to change her name. When she married, in 1950,…

    Continue reading →

  • Eavesdropping confined

    Eavesdropping confined

    Yesterday, the European Court of Human Rights gave an important ruling on the legality of intercepting telephone and email communications in Liberty and others v. the United Kingdom. The applicants, three NGOs from the United Kingdom and Ireland complained about the interception…

    Continue reading →

  • Evidence Obtained Through Violation of Article 3 ECHR

    Evidence Obtained Through Violation of Article 3 ECHR

    In what must have been one of its the most difficult cases, the European Court yesterday ruled in Gäfgen v. Germany. Yesterday’s judgment is the apex of long and highly publicised judicial proceedings. In 2003, the applicant, Magnus Gäfgen, was sentenced to…

    Continue reading →

  • New ECHR Articles EHRLR

    New ECHR Articles EHRLR

    The newest issue of the European Human Rights Law Review (2008-3) has just appeared, as fellow blog International Law Reporter reports. These are the featured articles: – Basak Çali, The Purposes of the European Human Rights System: One or Many?– Keir Starmer,…

    Continue reading →

  • Official Case Law Overviews

    Official Case Law Overviews

    With the huge amount of judgments and decisions flowing from Strasbourg, it becomes increasingly difficult to keep a good overview of the Court’s case law. Strasbourg itself offers several possibilities to alleviate any Court watcher’s burden. One important way are the Court’s…

    Continue reading →

  • Crossing the Line

    Crossing the Line

    This picture shows the Greek-Cypriot Solomon Solomou who tried, in the summer of 1996, to climb a flagpole (with a Turkish flag on it) just across the ceasefire line in Turkish-occupied Northern Cyprus. He was killed by five bullets as he climbed…

    Continue reading →

  • Grand Chamber Judgment Maslov v. Austria

    Grand Chamber Judgment Maslov v. Austria

    Yesterday, the Grand Chamber issued its judgment in the Maslov case on exclusion orders. I am very grateful that Maarten den Heijer, my former colleague from Leiden and an expert on migration law and human rights, was so kind to write a…

    Continue reading →

  • New Article on Interim Measures

    New Article on Interim Measures

    The newest issue of the European Constitutional Law Review (vol. 4, issue 1, 2008, pp. 41-63) contains an article by colleagues from Utrecht and Ghent universities on interim measures: Apart from being a case note on the judgment in Olaechea Cahuas v.…

    Continue reading →