This Autumn presents a remarkable range of ECHR-related publications in academic journals and books. Please find below an extensive selection:
The newest issue of the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Vol. 12, no. 4, 2014) includes:
* Helen Keller and Corina Heri, ‘Enforced Disappearance and the European Court of Human Rights: A ‘Wall of Silence’, Fact-Finding Difficulties and States as ‘Subversive Objectors’’
* Corina Heri, ‘Enforced Disappearance and the European Court of Human Rights’ ratione temporis Jurisdiction: A Discussion of Temporal Elements in Janowiec and Others v. Russia’
* Chimène I. Keitner, ‘Jones and Others v. United Kingdom’, International Legal Materials (Vol. 53, no. 3, 2014).
* Susana Sanz Caballero, ‘How
Could It Go So Wrong? Reformatio in Peius before the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR
in the Case Janowiec and Others v. Russia (or Polish Collective Memory Deceived
in Strasbourg)’, Polish Yearbook of International Law, vol. 33
(2013) pp. 259-278.
* M. Rohan, ‘Refugee family reunification rights: a basis in the European Court of Human Rights’ family
reunification jurisprudence’, Chicago Journal of International Law, vol. 15, no. 1 (2014) pp. 347-375.
* K. Dzehtsiarou and D. Coffey, ‘Legitimacy and independence of international tribunals: an analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 37, no. 2 (2014) pp. 271-322.
* E. Brems, ‘Face veil bans in the European Court of Human Rights: the importance of empirical findings’, Journal of Law and Policy, vol. 22, no. 2 (2013/14) pp. 517-552.
* D. Fenwick, ‘Abortion jurisprudence’ at Strasbourg: deferential, avoidant and normatively neutral?’, Legal Studies, vol. 34, no. 2 (2014) pp. 214-241.
* K. Dzehtsiarou and N. O’Meara, ‘Advisory jurisdiction and the European Court of Human Rights: a magic bullet for dialogue and docket-control?’, Legal Studies, vol. 34, no. 3 (2014) pp. 444-468.
* C. Ryngaert, ‘Jones v United Kingdom: the European Court of Human Rights restricts individual accountability for torture’, Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, vol. 30, no. 79 (2014) pp. 47-50.
* Uladzislau Belavusau, ‘Experts in hate speech cases: Towards a higher standard of proof in Strasbourg?’, in: Lukasz Gruszczynski and Wouter Werner (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals
Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (OUP 2014).
The new issue of the New Journal of European Criminal Law (vol. 5, no. 2, 2014) includes:
* E. Thoonen and W. Duijst, ‘Suicide in detention in the light of the Human Rights Convention’, pp.
121-148.
* T. Decaigny, ‘Inquisitorial and adversarial expert examinations in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights’, pp. 149-166.
* J. Boucht, ‘Civil asset forfeiture and the presumption of innocence under Article 6(2) ECHR’, pp. 221-255.
New articles in the online International Journal on Human Rights include:
* Ronagh J.A. McQuigg, ’The European Court of Human Rights and domestic violence: Valiuliene v. Lithuania’,
* Gregor Puppinck and Claire De La Hougue, ‘The right to assisted suicide in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights’.
Finally, please find in the menu on the right the link to a European-wide prize question, which is set up by the network of European Young Academies of Sciences – an exciting quest to think creatively about the future of Europe. Click on the image for more information – everyone is welcome to participate! I have the honor of serving in the jury.
