Skip to content
eCHR logo
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Resources on the Chisinau Declaration
  • Editors
  • How to Submit a Contribution
  • Contact
  • UN Committee against Torture takes a stand against Italy’s leadership in “letter of nine” process

    Corina Heri

    •

    May 12, 2026

    As the build-up towards the Chisinau Declaration continues, with the corresponding meeting of the Committee of Ministers just days away, the UN Committee against Torture (CAT) has taken a clear stand on some of the issues raised by the “letter of nine”/”statement…

    Continue reading →

  • Podcast on Migration and the ECtHR

    Podcast on Migration and the ECtHR

    Antoine Buyse

    •

    May 8, 2026

    The newest episode on the European Law-oriented podcast Europa Felix is dedicated to the current discussions around the European Court of Human Rights and migration. Its host, Felix Ronkes Agerbeek, interviews researcher Eva Sevrin (universities of Ghent and Leuven) on what the…

    Continue reading →

  • Stop Blaming the Migrants: The Chisinau Process as the Symptom of a Global Pushback against Otherness

    Hélène Tigroudja

    •

    May 6, 2026

    According to the Ministers of the Council of Europe, a political declaration on migration and the European system of human rights protection is urgently needed considering the “migration crisis” and migrant smuggling European States and societies are facing. They cite the overly…

    Continue reading →

  • New ECHR Readings

    New ECHR Readings

    Antoine Buyse

    •

    May 4, 2026

    Please find below our new selection of academic publications about the European Convention on Human Rights and its Court. Enjoy reading! ‘The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has played a crucial role in advancing transgender rights in Europe over the past…

    Continue reading →

  • New Judgment Implementation Report

    New Judgment Implementation Report

    Antoine Buyse

    •

    April 30, 2026

    With so much attention going to the much debated and upcoming Chișinău Declaration, also on our blog, attention has been less on the ongoing routines of the ECHR system. In that context, the Committee of Ministers recently published its Annual Report on…

    Continue reading →

  • Transnational Bad Faith and Non-Refoulement: Pretending Compliance with ECtHR Interim Measures

    Mariam Begadze

    •

    April 23, 2026

    Introduction In the early hours of 5 April, Georgia, acting in collaboration with Azerbaijan, violated an interim measure issued by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in a case pending against Georgia. Despite the interim measures requiring it not to do…

    Continue reading →

  • Conference on Revisiting the ECHR

    Conference on Revisiting the ECHR

    Matilda Radoš

    •

    April 22, 2026

    On the 22nd of May 2026, the Human Rights Research Group of the Leuven University’s Centre for Public Law is organizing a conference entitled ‘Revisiting the ECHR: A Closer Look at Calls for Change‘. The impetus for the conference was the by…

    Continue reading →

  • A Critical Look at the Implicit Messages in the CDDH Outcome Document with Elements for the Chișinău Declaration

    Wolfgang Benedek

    •

    April 16, 2026

    The outcome document ‘containing elements for a political declaration’ that the Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH) of the Council of Europe published on 20 March 2026 deserves a critical look. Thus, it can be established whether the CDDH managed to take…

    Continue reading →

  • The Chișinău Process: Dialogue or Duress?

    Alice Donald

    •

    April 14, 2026

    It has been a testing year for the European Court of Human Rights, from the letter of nine states in May 2025 to the Joint Statement of 27 to the Chișinău process that will culminate in a political declaration on migration on…

    Continue reading →

  • A Statement Built on Shaky Ground: Unveiling the Controversial Assumptions in the 27 Countries’ Statement

    Sharon Coen

    •

    April 10, 2026

    On December 10, 2025, twenty-seven countries delivered a joint statement to the Council of Europe’s conference of ministers of justice, calling for an “updated interpretation” of the European Convention on Human Rights in light of what the signatories identify as “today’s challenges.”…

    Continue reading →

Previous
1 2 3 4 5 … 152
Next

Search

Subscribe


Earlier posts

2026
  • September2
  • August3
  • July3
  • June9
  • May7
  • April10
  • March5
  • February5
  • January8
2025
  • December9
  • November8
  • October12
  • September4
  • August1
  • July3
  • June8
  • May5
  • April7
  • March3
  • February7
  • January13
2024
  • December2
  • November6
  • October11
  • September5
  • August2
  • July1
  • June6
  • May6
  • April10
  • March4
  • February5
  • January6
2023
  • December7
  • November6
  • October8
  • September3
  • August1
  • July3
  • June9
  • May14
  • April6
  • March8
  • February9
  • January9
2022
  • December7
  • November8
  • October11
  • September7
  • August5
  • July1
  • June2
  • May7
  • April8
  • March13
  • February6
  • January4
2021
  • December5
  • November6
  • October3
  • September5
  • August3
  • July5
  • June14
  • May5
  • April12
  • March9
  • February6
  • January9
2020
  • December4
  • November11
  • October6
  • September11
  • August2
  • July2
  • June3
  • May6
  • April3
  • March4
  • February3
  • January5
2019
  • December3
  • November4
  • October3
  • September2
  • August3
  • July2
  • June6
  • May5
  • April6
  • March4
  • February2
2018
  • December2
  • November4
  • October6
  • September1
  • August3
  • July1
  • June2
  • May4
  • April6
  • March5
  • February6
  • January4
2017
  • December1
  • November4
  • October4
  • September4
  • August1
  • July1
  • June3
  • May4
  • April4
  • March3
  • February4
  • January3
2016
  • December1
  • November6
  • October8
  • September2
  • August2
  • July3
  • May2
  • April6
  • March4
  • February2
  • January5
2015
  • December5
  • November4
  • October8
  • September3
  • July1
  • June3
  • May2
  • April6
  • March2
  • February2
  • January1
2014
  • December4
  • November2
  • October4
  • September5
  • August9
  • July3
  • June2
  • May6
  • April7
  • March6
  • February9
  • January10
2013
  • December8
  • November10
  • October11
  • September7
  • August3
  • July10
  • June8
  • May7
  • April11
  • March13
  • February10
  • January9
2012
  • December8
  • November9
  • October14
  • September11
  • August6
  • July6
  • June14
  • May7
  • April14
  • March15
  • February13
  • January11
2011
  • December10
  • November11
  • October15
  • September11
  • August12
  • July10
  • June10
  • May10
  • April11
  • March20
  • February13
  • January12
2010
  • December12
  • November12
  • October11
  • September13
  • August13
  • July2
  • June18
  • May15
  • April12
  • March12
  • February16
  • January14
2009
  • December10
  • November15
  • October12
  • September7
  • August9
  • July7
  • June10
  • May8
  • April9
  • March13
  • February11
  • January15
2008
  • December9
  • November17
  • October21
  • September2
  • August1
  • July17
  • June22
  • May5
eCHR logo
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Editors
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Resources Directory
  • ECHR Links
  • Human Rights Journals
  • Human Rights Blogs
  • Human Rights Research
  • Other Relevant Blogs
  • ECHR MOOC
  • Resource on ECHR Future

© 2026 ECHR Blog. All rights reserved. The content provided does not constitute legal advice.

Supported by the Netherlands Network of Human Rights Research (NNHRR) and the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM)