Month: October 2008

  • 10 Years of the New Full Time Court

    10 Years of the New Full Time Court

    •

    Yesterday, the Court organised a seminar to commemorate that in a few weeks from now, on 1 November, it will be exactly ten years ago that Protocol 11 to the ECHR entered into force. The Protocol merged the European Commission of Human Rights with the…

    Continue reading →

  • Another Echo of WW II

    Another Echo of WW II

    •

    Two large scale problems arising from World War II were dealt with by the Court in the same month. Last week, I already reported about the finalisation of the Court’s pilot case procedrue in the so-called Bug river cases, concerning Poles who had to leave…

    Continue reading →

  • Georgian Battleground Moving to Strasbourg

    Georgian Battleground Moving to Strasbourg

    •

    The armed conflict between Georgia and Russia concerning the region of South Ossetia might have been relatively short for a war, the effects of this violence are still being felt. Now, the battleground seems to be increasingly shifting to the courtroom. Georgia already filed an…

    Continue reading →

  • Caught in a Minefield

    Caught in a Minefield

    •

    Yesterday, the Court issued its judgment in the Albekov and others v. Russia case which may not only have been a landmark, but also a landmine judgment. Three family members of the applicants, all civilians, had been killed by landmines in a forest near the…

    Continue reading →

  • Conference on ECHR

    Conference on ECHR

    •

    The University of Nottingham’s Human Rights Law Centre is organising a conference for academics and legal practitioners on topical issues concerning the ECHR. This is the announcement: The Conference will be held on Friday 14 November 2008, 9am-5pm, in the Great Hall, Trent Building, University…

    Continue reading →

  • Hearing in Domestic Violence Case

    Hearing in Domestic Violence Case

    •

    Today the Court held a hearing in a case concerning domestic violence. The applicant, Nahide Opuz, has lodged a complaint against Turkey. The case centres on Opuz’ extremely violent husband who gravely ill-treated her and her mother many times and eventually killed her mother. Although…

    Continue reading →

  • The Pilot has Landed

    The Pilot has Landed

    •

    This week the Court concluded its first full cycle in a so-called pilot case procedure. It struck out 176 pending applications in the “Bug River” cases. These cases all concerned claims of applicants who disagreed with a Polish scheme set up to compensate people who…

    Continue reading →

  • Article on Rights of ‘Travelling Peoples’

    Article on Rights of ‘Travelling Peoples’

    •

    The most recent issue of the Human Rights Law Review (volume 8, no. 3, 2008) contains an article on one of my areas of particular interest: Ralph Sandland, Developing a Jurisprudence of Difference: The Protection of the Human Rights of Travelling Peoples by the European…

    Continue reading →

  • Judgment on Apology of Terrorism

    Judgment on Apology of Terrorism

    •

    Cartoons are, as we have seen in recent years, not always completely innocuous. Today the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in a case focusing on the controversy about a cartoon depicting the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York…

    Continue reading →

  • Interpretation of International Humanitarian Law

    Interpretation of International Humanitarian Law

    •

    Still catching up on recent Court judgments, allow me to highlight a recent Grand Chamber decision of the Court. In Korbely v. Hungary the Court found a violation of Article 7 ECHR (no punishment without law) by eleven votes to six. The applicant had participated…

    Continue reading →

Subscribe


Further Reading

Earlier posts

2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008